1. Describe your work and work profile in a very simple manner?
A brief perspective on the PE industry - large
insurance houses, pension funds (and similar
players) sit on a large corpus of funds. They
generally are on a lookout to make a good risk-
adjusted return on this corpus. Since this is a
non-core activity for them they look for
manager (or general partners or PE funds) who
can manage a portion of their funds by
investing it in promising assets and providing
an exit over a gestation period of 5-7 years.
These PE funds are hired for their expertise to
sense whether an asset is a good investment or
not.
Private Equity (PE) generally has 4 buckets of
work :
-
•
Raising money from Limited Partners
-
•
Deploying money in potential assets
-
•
Managing the investee asset
-
•
Providing an exit from the investment
Being a lean team, my work revolves around all four basis the requirement and ongoing engagements.
Fundraising :
I would help the CEO in making pitch/marketing material to showcase to
potential limited partners to help raise funds for our PE fund. This marketing material is
very fund specific and generally talks about ones thesis of the geography (say a particular
fund is investing in India, then what is the rationale for that) and the asset-class (say a
particular fund is investing only in infrastructure or real estate or somebody is sector
agnostic) that the PE look into. Since many of the institutional limited partners are based
out of India, the Indian PE funds can either adopt to raise funds in INR terms or can look
into a hedging arrangement.
Deployment :
While I am currently part of a real estate-focused PE fund, I will cover about
the deployment function in general. There is a huge funneling that happens here – i.e. PE
funds generally have a pipeline of deals being showcased by either investment bankers or
an in-housed sourced deal. These prospective deals need to be pressure tested on various
angles – how is the industry, business model of the company, externalities that can affect
the business, customer base, future prospects for the company, value drivers, promoter
group and then the valuation. The valuation is done from the perspective of finding what is
a probable exit multiple and returns (IRR) that the PE fund can make if the company is
invested into.
The deal is then socialized with the Investment Committee (these are generally the top
brass of the PE fund, at times also involving representation from limited partners) and basis
their go/no-go decision a detailed assessment of the deal is done - by way of appointing
independent diligence consultants, etc. Once the diligence findings are factored into the
valuations and even then the results look good, the deal is again taken to the Investment
Committee for a final decision. Basis this call, the investment is made in the company.
Asset management:
PE players generally come with a good strategic experience and they
can help their investee companies by finding the right human capital, co-strategizing the
business or at times hand-holding the business operations. This is extremely important
exercise because herein an attempt is being made to actually get the cashflows (or
overshoot) considered in the initial valuation exercise. If the operations of the company
are not well-aligned, then it may so happen that the cash-flow is not achieved and the
entire return-thesis goes for a toss!
Exit :
Once the asset is stabilized and has reached a desired level, a PE would lookout to get
an exit from the asset so that the LP money can be repatriated, along with the returns of
course. Typically, a PE fund would have some hurdles return rate, and if they are able to
deliver a return beyond that hurdle rate then they get to share the returns above it with
the limited partners. So this can be a huge inflow item for the PE player and is a great
function of whether the deployment was done in the right asset, whether the asset was
managed properly over the investment tenure and whether they are able to find the right
exit. The exit can be done via various avenues – public listing, selling stake to a financial
player (another PE fund), selling stake to a strategic player (another asset in the same
industry), or the promoters of the asset may buy the stake.
2. Can you share your Daily Routine with us?
As I mentioned earlier, I am part of all the
functions – so depending on which function-
hat I am wearing on a particular day, my
routine would differ. To give a flavor :
I would generally start my day early, around 6
am, to look at any LP email or any immediate
requirements that they have (since these are
different time-zones, it helps to look at your
mailbox early on). I would reach the office at 10
am. The first 3 hours are usually spent in typing
out responses, doing analysis on a particular
asset-class etc. and communicating the
result/details to the LPs.
The remaining time generally goes in evaluation phase - evaluating a potential deal on the
table (since I am part of the real estate segment, these are generally land parcels or distresses
real estate developer that I am looking at), I will look into the particular micro-market,
surrounding areas and sense the rentals/prices going around in that area. If the deal looks
good, I would start the process mentioned above in the deployment section. In case there
aren’t many deals in the pipeline, I would reach out to channel partners to get a sense of the
market and what potential deals may be coming up.
In case the CEO is about to pitch to a potential LP for further funding – I delve into the specific
requirements of the investor (For example, whether the investor is looking into residential real
estate, commercial real estate or a mixed-use) and prepare some marketing material for same.
The day generally ends around 9 pm. If need be, one has to be available 24
hours for deal execution!
It is either of the activities and barely a mix of all three that happens on a particular day.
For a sector-agnostic or a non-real estate PE, this would generally entail reaching out to some
investment bankers to get a sense of the deals that they have to pitch. You can evaluate them
and then take a call on which one would you like to proceed further.
3. How did you reach this stage in your career?
I was working in the sell-side earlier (transaction advisory) and was intrigued by the way the
PE players are able to take such calls on the
businesses. For this, I interacted with some of my
friends in the PE industry and they mentioned that
valuation bit comes at the end to evaluate an
asset. Firstly, it is important to form a view on the
industry and the asset and once you feel upbeat
about that then we delve into the valuation. For
me this was slightly an unchartered domain as
being a CA, I would generally look at a company
from a numbers perspective and may read a couple
of industry reports. But to be able to recognize the
value drivers in a business, I considered a class-
room fashioned training and that’s when I went ahead for MBA.
Once in the course, during the placement season, the PE fund came to hire from the
campus and I was selected during the interview process.
4. What skills should a candidate possess if he wants to take up a profession similar to yours?
While there are various technical skills that one
should definitely know – valuation, 3-
statement financial modeling, multiples etc.
There are many softer aspects that should also
be focused on and are very important :
Market research :
As I mentioned getting a
sense of the industry is very
important, and you can go to any
extent for that(I have done a couple of
telephonic interviews with people
showcasing myself to be a reporter!)
Connect the dots :
Be able to connect the
various happenings in the market (impact of Brexit or US-China trade war on an Indian
engineering / info-tech firm). This is important as you are making a projection on the
potential returns from the asset and any market happening may have a bearing on that
Have a view :
– Why did Sensex go down? Agriculture’s contribution to GDP is reducing year-
on-year – should governments still be waiving farm loans? Etc. If you are informed it is easier
to talk on these pointers. The idea is not to be right or wrong, the idea is to be informed and
have a view. Also, be open to intellectually challenge and also accept a contrarian view
Don’t just know formulas, know what they represent :
if you know what they represent you can communicate your findings easily
5. What are the Pros & Cons of your profession?
Pros :
-
•
Deep insight into industries, basis the kind of
fund you are in (sector-specific or agnostic)
-
•
Interaction with promoters and investment
bankers on a regular basis helps you be more
informed and keeps you on your toes to identify,
sense any red-flags quickly.
-
•
The hours are generally relaxed than that of
investment bankers (10-12 working hours),
however, when a deal is in conclusion stage work
can get demanding.
-
•
The compensation aspect is decent and is linked
with the investment cycle (entry-to-exit).
-
•
Smaller team-size gives you good exposure.
Cons :
-
•
A sector-specific fund can at times get frustrating as the learnings may get plateaued.
-
•
Smaller team-size may get messy as admin (non-core) activities may also fall on your shoulders.
-
•
You may spend long hours in pursuing a deal for long and it may still not fructify
-
•
If an investment goes rogue, the team may get to bear the brunt
6. What is the best way to bag a job similar to yours?
Generally, people in PE come from two
backgrounds i.e. ex-management consultants
and ex-investment bankers. As mentioned
earlier, the role requires not only financial
skillset but also an ability to connect the dots.
Ideally, a candidate can look to join a
Management Consulting industry and make a
move after 3-4 years. Getting into an MC is also
a competitive process and generally MCs hire
from the B-Schools and seldom they hire
fresher.
On a separate note, PE is a very closed-door
industry – hiring is largely driven by internal
referrals or some good HR firms. So be mindful
of that front!
7. What advice would you give to the freshers who are willing to
venture into this line?
For finance professionals, it would help to start
with a sell-side role (investment banking,
corporate finance, transaction advisory) that
helps to brush up ones skillset and makes you
realize the long-hours. Maybe it can also help
one filter-out whether finance based consulting
roles are a good fit or not. Post that probably try
to get in touch with some recruitment
consultant and reach out to people in the PE
space to get a foot-door entry. Another way can
also be to go to a B-school after your 2-3 years
of work-ex and post Masters, trying out in a PE
space or an MC space to later shift in PE.
PE is generally a lean structure and have few hierarchies, so do
not focus on the designation one gets (I know
people who have been associates for 5 years, but they are
reasonably senior people in the industry).
Final Notes
“The views & opinions expressed in the article are that of the author. The blog contains the
opinions of the author and doesn’t reflect the opinions of any organizations with which the
author may be associated. The graphics are for illustrations purpose only we do not mean
to plagiarize anybody else’s content”